[Tagging] RFC historic=tomb and tomb=* tags, WAS Re: RFC: tomb key

Paul Allen pla16021 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 18:54:55 UTC 2021


On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 16:26, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:
[cemetery=grave]

>
>> I agree that the key is odd. How does this relate to
> cemetery=war_cemetery, cemetery=columbarium, cemetery=mausoleum,
> cemetery=grave_yard, cemetery=burial_forest?
>

It doesn't.  Those are types of cemetery while cemetery=grave is a
plot within a cemetery.  With parking we have amenity=parking
and amenity=parking_space but that doesn't really work with
cemetery as the key.

I'm not sure what a good fix for this is.  Neither grave=yes
nor cemetery:grave=yes appeal to me.  Maybe we should
let the dead rest in peace.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210226/b303eceb/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list