[Tagging] RFC historic=tomb and tomb=* tags, WAS Re: RFC: tomb key
Paul Allen
pla16021 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 18:54:55 UTC 2021
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 16:26, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:
[cemetery=grave]
>
>> I agree that the key is odd. How does this relate to
> cemetery=war_cemetery, cemetery=columbarium, cemetery=mausoleum,
> cemetery=grave_yard, cemetery=burial_forest?
>
It doesn't. Those are types of cemetery while cemetery=grave is a
plot within a cemetery. With parking we have amenity=parking
and amenity=parking_space but that doesn't really work with
cemetery as the key.
I'm not sure what a good fix for this is. Neither grave=yes
nor cemetery:grave=yes appeal to me. Maybe we should
let the dead rest in peace.
--
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210226/b303eceb/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list