[Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

Volker Schmidt voschix at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 17:41:55 UTC 2021

Thanks, Kevin, for the clarification of the terminology

When I started to tinker with some of the old railway lines (I only do it
occasionally) I used the same life-cycle terms that you list, in actual
fact starting from my language understanding, not studying the wiki.
I think in everyday language razing something is a step that you may take
for something that is abandoned, as it is used in this headline:
"Abandoned homes in Chicago: Revitalize or raze them? "

On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 at 18:01, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 11:03 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>> This kind of temporary keeping no longer existing objects is commonly
>> accepted.
>> (note temporary part - mapping objects that are fully and completely
>> gone[1] and
>> unlikely to be mapped by accident is at best extremely dubious, and
>> deleting them is fine)
>> [1] so for example it is OK to map railway tracks where some evidence of
>> them remains
> We all seem to be reading from more or less the same page, then:
> disused - track still present, could be put back into service with minimal
> work (vegetation clearance, track inspection, ...)
> abandoned - track still present, deteriorated, would need construction
> work (repairing washouts//slides, realigning track, removing trees, ...)
> before being placed in service
> razed - rails lifted or buried [1], sleepers and ballast may remain,
> traces on the ground such as embankments, cuttings and drainage features
> observable OR track visible in obsolete imagery and way included to prevent
> re-addition of a demolished feature.
> As another corner case, I'm willing to allow
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4261370 - The ballasted grade is
> still there under the reservoir, and in fact the scrap crew got the rails
> out only just in time.  The rail mappers might want to check out
> http://ginosrailblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/last-days-of-gloversville-and-northville.html,
> which has some pictures of a locomotive on a totally submerged section of
> track, while scrappers in knee boots are hastily tearing up the rails
> behind it. They were forced to leave about 1.5 km of rail behind, but were
> able to recover it during a drought the following summer. Portions of the
> roadbed occasionally surface in a dry season when the water level has been
> drawn down, and bits of sleepers have occasionally washed up as driftwood.
>  [1] One area that I once lived near had a streetcar line where they never
> bothered even to recover the rails, just paved over them. The rails
> occasionally reappeared where for one reason or another the car line and
> the road were not coaligned.
> --
> 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210102/cacef18c/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list