[Tagging] is explicit segregated tag needed on all ways allowing cyclists and pedestrians?

[Andrew Harvey]

In NSW we'd tag that as

highway=cycleway (although less important, as the foot and bicycle tags
indicated it's a shared path, so data consumers shouldn't care if this is
cycleway/footway/path)
foot=designated (because signposted for pedestrians)
bicycle=designated (because signposted for bicycles)
segregated=no (because they don't each have their own dedicated lanes, they
share the same space)

Line painted in the middle just tells users to keep left based on the
direction of travel, it doesn't put cyclists and pedestrians in their own
lanes.

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 12:12, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> So what would you call this one: https://goo.gl/maps/Q3HRsxGzN6vLkU4ZA?
>
> If you swing the view around, you can see that, once upon a time, there
> was a painted line up the middle of the path, but that mostly wore off long
> ago, & has never been replaced.
>
> Currently tagged just as highway=footway
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210103/518945dc/attachment.htm>