[Tagging] Changing proposal process rules - RFC
graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 5 22:40:01 UTC 2021
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 05:38, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> > On 5 Jan 2021, at 20:24, Tomas Straupis <tomasstraupis at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Voters should also have practice - requirement for voters to have
> > mapped say at least 100 000 objects
think it isn’t completely unreasonable to require some mapping
> experience, but these numbers seem they might make voting a thing for a
> small selected group
I agree that there should be a requirement for experience but think that
100000 is way too high, & it would mean that voting is only for the "elite"
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 05:52, Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com>
> A more meaningful metric is the number of mapping days.
Maybe just a limit of 1 year of mapping before you can vote?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging