[Tagging] Fw: Narrowing the application range of the smoothness tags
stefan.tauner at gmx.at
Thu Jan 14 10:34:06 UTC 2021
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:04:07 +0000
Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
> It is not clear what you're planning to replace the page with (if it's
> the wall of text on the discussion page that would surely be a bad
> idea). Perhaps create a "key:smoothness" page underneath your own
> username in the wiki and have people comment on that?
I think that's a good idea. I read the original email, took a brief
look and thought "yeah, we should make it more verifiable but that
explanations are too long, let's see what happens" :)
I'd add a column with a brief explanation on how to verify/measure/
objectify the respective value based on your sentences.
PS: I would never tag "smooth paving stones with seamless connections"
as excellent. At least none I have ever seen. The top tier should be
reserved for surfaces where you don't notice any bumps whatsoever when
riding skates, skateboards, bicycles with >>5 bar tire pressure on
them IMHO - or we need another top tier since the current definition is
"usable with vehicle type X", but a router would need a way to
distinguish ways that are "usable for thin rollers" from those that are
even better to prefer them in its algorithm for those vehicle types.
Soooo I guess my grumblings became off-topic and I'll stop now ;)
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
More information about the Tagging