[Tagging] Fw: Narrowing the application range of the smoothness tags
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Jan 14 11:57:48 UTC 2021
Jan 14, 2021, 12:44 by stefan.tauner at gmx.at:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:54:11 +0100
> Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 11:36 Uhr schrieb Stefan Tauner <
>> stefan.tauner at gmx.at>:
>> > PS: I would never tag "smooth paving stones with seamless connections"
>> > as excellent. At least none I have ever seen.
>> here you are:
>> (not paving stones actually, but stone and optimal smoothness)
> Not paving stones as defined by the wiki IMHO - but I don't think we
> have a better tagging for them.
> If smoothness would be more widely used I guess they would fit
> surface=paving_stones and smoothness=excellent, yes. However, I think
> these should get a separate value, e.g., polished_stone.
> 1: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones
IMHO it fits definition and even one of example images.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging