[Tagging] Fw: Narrowing the application range of the smoothness tags

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Jan 14 11:57:48 UTC 2021




Jan 14, 2021, 12:44 by stefan.tauner at gmx.at:

> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:54:11 +0100
> Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 11:36 Uhr schrieb Stefan Tauner <
>> stefan.tauner at gmx.at>: 
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > PS: I would never tag "smooth paving stones with seamless connections"
>> > as excellent. At least none I have ever seen. 
>>
>>
>>
>> here you are:
>> https://notiziaoggi.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/32474918_portici-piazza-italia-gattinara-da-rifare.jpg
>> http://www.ocrarossa.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/mosaico-via-cernaia-torino1.jpg
>> (not paving stones actually, but stone and optimal smoothness)
>> http://www.comune.genova.it/sites/default/files/imagecache/immagine_dettaglio_articolo/documenti/immagini/articoli/mosaici_0.jpg
>>
>
> Not paving stones as defined by the wiki[1] IMHO - but I don't think we
> have a better tagging for them.
> If smoothness would be more widely used I guess they would fit
> surface=paving_stones and smoothness=excellent, yes. However, I think
> these should get a separate value, e.g., polished_stone.
>
> 1: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones
>
IMHO it fits definition and even one of example images.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210114/6752c367/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list