[Tagging] toilets : should never be part of the road "for vehicle" ?

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat Jan 16 23:06:43 UTC 2021


America? Drive through toilets :))

On 16/1/21 8:08 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> I cannot imagine situation where it would be a correct tagging.
>
>
> Jan 15, 2021, 22:02 by marc_marc at mailo.com:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     a newbie create https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8312864505
>     the node "toilets" is part of a way "for vehicle"
>
>     I'm fine with a toilets connected to a way "for pedestrian" (path,
>     footway, pedestrian, corridor, ...).
>     But with a way for vehicle (residential, unclassified, ...),
>     it that always wrong/unwanted ?
>     I'm asking for feedback before opening an issue to improve validators.
>
>     Regards,
>     Marc
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210117/e826fd71/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list