[Tagging] noaddress=yes and (possibly) implicit buildings

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Jan 17 19:54:44 UTC 2021

Jan 17, 2021, 20:51 by stefan.tauner at gmx.at:

> On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 20:40:28 +0100
> Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I agree with Alan that the number on the ground should go in addr:housenumber
> So you prefer wrong and misleading data in OSM, great idea. So many
> people misunderstand the on-the-ground rule in OSM :( It is meant to be
> an arbitrary in unclear cases
"signage on the ground and official database conflict each other"
seems to qualify as unclear case to me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210117/d3274337/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list