[Tagging] noaddress=yes and (possibly) implicit buildings

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Jan 17 21:39:09 UTC 2021

sent from a phone

> On 17 Jan 2021, at 20:53, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at gmx.at> wrote:
> So you prefer wrong and misleading data in OSM, great idea.

I wrote I would tag both numbers if I were aware of the situation, with appropriate tagging. When wrong numbers are sign posted (wrong in a sense they are not official), they are still what will be most useful for identifying a place when you are there, they are the right information for whom is on the ground.

Cheers Martin 

More information about the Tagging mailing list