[Tagging] noaddress=yes and (possibly) implicit buildings

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Jan 17 22:17:57 UTC 2021




Jan 17, 2021, 21:03 by stefan.tauner at gmx.at:

> On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 20:54:44 +0100 (CET)
> Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> "signage on the ground and official database conflict each other"
>> seems to qualify as unclear case to me.
>>
>
> But it isn't unclear for anybody - not for the post man, nor any other
> deliver services, or the residents, or any other locals; only for
> people blindly following rules. Sometimes the on-the-ground rule is not
> applicable but one has to rely on local knowledge and one's brain.
>
"local knowledge" is part of on-the-ground rule

If one known that signed address is incorrect and real one
is different then it may be OK to tag real one

But if signed address differs from some database then signed one wins

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210117/1a5ddfe3/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list