[Tagging] noaddress=yes and (possibly) implicit buildings

Volker Schmidt voschix at gmail.com
Mon Jan 18 23:28:17 UTC 2021

Now I see where the problem is.
My fault was to see the world with my German or English eyes.
In Germany the property has an address, so a shed or a garage that is next
to a house on the same piece of land  has the same address as the house.
And the "Croation" problem may be valid also here in Italy. Here the house
number, and with that the address is assigned to the entrance.


On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 00:06, Matija Nalis <
mnalis-openstreetmaplist at voyager.hr> wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 23:57:52 +0100, Matija Nalis <
> mnalis-openstreetmaplist at voyager.hr> wrote:
> > So the thread is about weather EXPLICITLY adding "noaddress=yes" is OK,
> > even in situation when "noaddress=yes" would be IMPLIED if correct
> building
> > type was mapped INSTEAD (eg. "building=yes" in most of the world).
> ops, it should have been "building=shed" instead of "building=yes", sorry
> --
> Opinions above are GNU-copylefted.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210119/405aae9d/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list