[Tagging] RFC: remove alphanumeric code visible in infoboxes at OSM Wiki linking to Wikidata

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Jan 19 13:44:09 UTC 2021




Jan 19, 2021, 14:17 by andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk:

> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 08:35, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/remove_link_to_Wikidata_from_infoboxes
>>
>
> After a cursory reading, I've already removed one false claim. It's
> false for reasons that have been explained to you previously.
>
Why it would be false? 

I reverted your edit and added clarification and fixed typo.

More info would be useful if you want to discuss it.

As mentioned you are welcomed to edit
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/remove_link_to_Wikidata_from_infoboxes#Rationale_against_removal
to list anything that in my opinion I missed.


> And now you're canvassing
>
Well yes. The whole point of RFC on proposal is to widely discuss proposal.  

> , with partisan claims.
>
If there is something wrong with any claim being specific would help.

>> Preemptive explanation:
>>
>> It has no impact on wikidata=*
>> It has no impact on data items, including P12 property.
>>  It will be still possible to add and use Wikidata links stored in data items
>> It has no impact on anything mapped
>>
>
> And these are straw men arguments.
>
Nothing quoted here is an argument, arguments are in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/remove_link_to_Wikidata_from_infoboxes#Rationale

That part is an explanation and clarification for people less aware about
differences between wikidata tag, wikidata parameter in template and
wikidata property in data items etc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210119/20f645c1/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list