[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Documenting the Key: addr:parentstreet
nealepb at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jan 20 17:41:40 UTC 2021
I was seeking to document (the majority of) de facto use. I have not checked all >3,600 current uses to see whether they are all consistent; perhaps a few are not.
I decided to use a proposal because I was also seeking to explain the rationale behind it. (...and I had not submitted a proposal before, so it was a new challenge)
>"Relations that group buildings that share a single address." can you specifyrelation type there?
The only live example I have found uses "relation:site". You can follow the link in the proposal to the real-world example. In the proposal, I say, "...the buildings could then be grouped in a site relation".
I will check the other relations that you quote, in case it could be applicable there, but I don't think it will be.
On Wednesday, 20 January 2021, 16:58:53 GMT, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
Is it redefining tag or documenting de facto use?
Because for documenting de facto use it is also fine to simply
create new page anyway - and ask for review (though
proposal is OK).
If it is redefining tag - what is changing compared to
the current use?
"Relations that group buildings that share a single address." can you specify
relation type there?
It is not
Jan 20, 2021, 17:45 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:
With some trepidation, I have now moved the proposal to document the key: "addr:parentstreet" to the RFC stage.
This is my first proposal, so please be understanding.
Please see here:
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging