[Tagging] Pedestrian access tagging

Ture Pålsson ture at turepalsson.se
Sun Jan 24 16:32:55 UTC 2021


> 24 jan. 2021 kl. 16:54 skrev Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> 
> 
> 
> sent from a phone
> 
>> On 24 Jan 2021, at 12:13, Ture Pålsson via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Digging around in news headlines, I found a case where a drunk man had been walking somewhere along this road: https://www.google.com/maps/@57.6427048,11.9321656,3a,75y,359.21h,95.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1su3YnMPwsyndGQZdGun8f1A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 <https://www.google.com/maps/@57.6427048,11.9321656,3a,75y,359.21h,95.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1su3YnMPwsyndGQZdGun8f1A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192> (Rv 40 between Bollebygd and Landvetter). A passing lorry driver reported seeing him and possibly hitting him with the rear-view mirror. The man was picked up by the police and taken to hospital for minor injuries in one hand, and then charged with ”recklessness in traffic” (vårdslöshet i trafik). I do not know how the case ended. 
> 
> 
> it could be relevant to see how it ended, because from signage it doesn’t appear to be forbidden from what I have seen. Maybe walking when drunk can be charged as recklessness in traffic by itself?

Sorry, I must have pasted the wrong link there. The road where the drunk man was is (mostly) motorway, so no walking there, drunk or not.

But yes, you could probably be charged with recklessness in traffic for stumbling around drunk on any road, especially if you manage to cause an accident.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210124/b5ac3c58/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list