[Tagging] consider website=www.openstreetmap.org to be OK
pla16021 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 14:36:57 UTC 2021
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 16:35, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>
> Taginfo shows 0 (zero) uses of the string "gopher://" in values or keys:
It looks to me like it only searches keys, not values. I could be wrong,
when I replaced "gopher://" with "yes" I only got a few bizarre keys with
"yes" in them rather than the gazillions of results I would expect if it
also searching values.
> This discussion seems to be considering very hypothetical uses rather than
> what is practical for mapper and database users.
Gopher is rare these days (and always was). But I have encountered
that were only available by ftp. I've not yet had to include such in a
that does not mean it will never happen.
Of course, if you're being meticulous you don't just type in a URL and
hope you didn't make a mistake, you check it in your browser. And if
you then cut-and-paste from the address bar, you get the scheme for
free. So anyone using due diligence to enter URLs won't find it a problem
to enter the scheme, it would be more effort to remove it.
website=* in practice is only used for normal website addresses like
> https:// or http://
And should only be used with those schemes. But it is (IMO) unsuitable for
anything BUT websites and should not be used for a single web page within
a site. For such webpages I use URL (since we don't have a webpage key).
> I have not bothered to add these prefixes when typing in a web address
> since about 1996.
I always check such links in my browser. Usually because I've clicked on a
given elsewhere, often a google search, and need to check that it is really
I think it is. From there, it's cut-and-paste because that's less effort
the whole thing in (and less prone to error). If you're typing it in every
you're doing it the hard way.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging