[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Utility poles proposal

[François Lacombe]

Hi Martin

It depends on the situation.
Who operates the pole? Who is coming when it fell down?
Has the public lighting operator been asked to install a camera or was it
different?

Depending of the design or local signage (company names, norms refs,
manufacturer's model name...), you can guess it from other poles, with or
without cameras, with or without lighting.

All the best

François

Le sam. 5 juin 2021 à 11:19, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a
écrit :

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 4 Jun 2021, at 20:39, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > However every pole have a primary usage (surveillance cameras may be
> supported on power poles but power lines aren't attached to surveillance
> masts)
>
>
> what about surveillance cameras and lighting sharing the same pole, which
> is primary? Does it depend on the situation?
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210606/cdb464b6/attachment.htm>