[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Utility poles proposal

[François Lacombe]

Hi Martin,

I forgot the most important point in my last answer (despite it remains
valid): surveillance isn't an utility.
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:utility

However, we could definitely find sone situations where the same operator
operates two different networks in the list.
Let's imagine a power/telco operator who rolls out both power and telco in
the same time.
IMHO poles will be utility=power as power cables are way heavier than fibre
or metallic lines for telecommunications.

I bet street lights will be heavier than surveillance cameras so
utility=street_lighting would be the right value in your hospital.

I'll make the proposal more precise about utility decision:
- Who operates the pole?
- If this operator operates several utilities on the same pole, what is the
heavier one on the pole?

That is good inputs, thank you

François

Le dim. 6 juin 2021 à 22:42, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a
écrit :

>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 6 Jun 2021, at 16:29, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > It depends on the situation.
> > Who operates the pole?
>
>
> let’s assume it is a hospital area and both, lighting and surveillance
> cams are operated by “the hospital”.
> Or we could imagine a surveillance camera integrated in the lights (one
> device).
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210608/4039e6f6/attachment-0001.htm>