[Tagging] RFC: Seaway key - proposal for mapping ports

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 6 Mar 2021, at 14:35, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If there is no intention to use seaway
> to map routes then using it for termini is confusing, false to dictionary
> definitions, false to common usage, and a bad choice of tag name.
> 
> It is an exceptionally bad choice of tag name if it will be used to map
> facilities for which there are no associated routes (such as fishing ports
> with no ferry or shipping services). 


maybe I should have chosen aeroway for explaining the analogy, as it is more similar to seaway than railway is. aeroway=helipad? hangar? These are among the most used values but have nothing to do with „routes“

Cheers Martin