[Tagging] Tagging piste:difficulty for track piste:type=nordic; skitour

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mikes at gmail.com
Thu May 6 05:34:47 UTC 2021


Hello Yves,
I would love something like this!
This would solve the problem.
mira


On Wed, May 5, 2021, 10:14 PM Yves <ycai at mailbox.org> wrote:

> One solution could be piste:grooming:skitour=classic
> piste:difficulty:skitour=easy etc.
>
> The prefix piste is important because of piste:grooming:hike
>
> What do others think?
> Regards,
> Yves
>
>
>
> Le 5 mai 2021 21:19:16 GMT+02:00, "Jaromír Mikeš" <mira.mikes at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello,
>> sorry for the late answer.
>> Alternative 1) and also 2) is very time consuming and not very easy and
>> intuitive solutions
>> I saw quite a lot of piste:grooming=skate;classic or
>> piste:grooming=skate+classic used in Czech mountains and also some cases of
>> piste:type=skitour;nordic or piste:type=downhill;nordic
>> piste:type=nordic;sled etc.
>> So I wouldn't say it is a rare cases ... and maybe they would be even
>> more usual if there would be a defined way to tag them.
>> I've also contacted OsmAnd support ( my favorite map app) with this
>> question and you were right two values separated with semicolon are not
>> supported.
>> I've opened a bug in their tracker with this topic because I believe
>> there are such cases in real situations.
>>
>> best regards
>> mira
>>
>> čt 29. 4. 2021 v 12:49 odesílatel Yves via Tagging <
>> tagging at openstreetmap.org> napsal:
>>
>>> 2) Paul's second option is not very advisable when you map difficulty
>>> and grooming on each way of the route.
>>>
>>> Both several difficulties (or grooming) semicolon separated and adjacent
>>> ways are present in the database, but they are very rare.
>>> The semicolon variant is not likely to be used by data consumer, and
>>> multiple ways are a pain to edit, so I'm afraid that there is no formal and
>>> good solution to this yet.
>>>
>>> Yves - Opensnowmap
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 29 avril 2021 09:38:20 GMT+02:00, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 06:44, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Would something like this make sense?
>>>>> piste:type=nordic;skitour
>>>>> piste:difficulty=intermediate;easy
>>>>> Different difficulty in same order as piste types?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It makes sense to the extent that something similar was done for
>>>> electricity pylons, but data consumers may not bother to implement
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Two alternatives:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Duplicate the way, make one piste:type=nordic + piste:difficulty=
>>>> intermediate; make the other piste:type=skitour; piste:difficulty=easy.
>>>>
>>>> 2) Use route=piste to create two routes that both incorporate the same
>>>> way, one route for nordic and the other for skitour.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210506/d8e19058/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list