[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Big Bench
francians at gmail.com
Mon May 17 16:54:55 UTC 2021
Il lun 17 mag 2021, 15:04 Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 14:30, Jmapb <jmapb at gmx.com> wrote:
>> On 5/17/2021 5:52 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> > the ones I know could be seen as benches, albeit not having human
>> > dimensions they are intended to sit on and have a ladder to facilitate
>> > climbing on them.
>> So tag them as observation towers? (No, no really...)
>> I'd go with tourism=attraction, attraction=oversized_furniture,
>> brand=Big Bench, and optionally ref, name, inscription, material,
>> And, for the ones that pass the bench "duck test" by being usable for
>> seating, add amenity=bench as well.
> OK, but this is not the case with the Big Benches that are the object of
> the proposal., with the exception of normal-size Small Big Benches
> <https://bigbenchcommunityproject.org/small-big-bench/>, which are for
> sale by the non-profit Big Bench project.
> To be clear:
> An amenity=bench is an object on which people can sit down. If they need
> to climb a ladder, or if any acrobatics are needed to reach it, they are
> not amenity=bench.
> If I make a map of amenity=bench locations I want to see only benches on
> which a normal-size adult can sit down without problems.
It's why I don't want to make a bench_type tag or similar. You can sit on
it, but it's not a normal operation 😉
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging