[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Big Bench

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue May 18 05:54:10 UTC 2021



sent from a phone

> On 18 May 2021, at 06:56, Francesco Ansanelli <francians at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Many people disagree about using or implying amenity=bench for such features. If we need a more wide spread tagging scheme I may adapt my proposal to:
> 
> tourism=giant_furniture 
> 
> + giant_furniture=bench 
> 
> + brand=Big Bench
> 
> 
> In this way, most of the example made by Schoschi, are suitable to be adapted.
> 
> May this be an acceptable compromise?
> 


would be ok for me, although I would prefer amenity 


Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210518/5e4830d3/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list