[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Big Bench

Francesco Ansanelli francians at gmail.com
Wed May 19 19:20:08 UTC 2021


Hello,

I've created a new proposal collecting various suggestions:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/giant_furniture

I'll adapt the original proposal too, if necessary.
Francesco

Il giorno mar 18 mag 2021 alle ore 12:02 nathan case <nathancase at outlook.com>
ha scritto:

> I think this is a good approach and is better than amenity.
>
>
>
> From the Wiki pages:
>
>
>
> Tourism: “Places and things of specific interest to tourists including
> places to see, places to stay, things and places providing information and
> support to tourists."
>
> Amenity: “For describing useful and important facilities for visitors and
> residents. Facilities include for example toilets, telephones, banks,
> pharmacies, prisons and schools."
>
>
>
> I don’t think a big bench is a useful or important facility, but may be a
> place of interest for tourists (e.g. for the views or for taking photos on).
>
>
>
> As for falling under the tourism=artwork tag, it could do. There is
> already artwork_type=bench which I guess this may be for highly decorated
> benches. Big furniture doesn’t really seem like art to me but is, of
> course, highly subjective.
>
>
>
> Also: could I suggest you modify the proposal to “big furniture” or
> something like that? I have seen giant chairs (rather than benches) and so
> including them in your scheme would be useful (i.e. giant_furniture=chair)
>
>
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Francesco Ansanelli <francians at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:54 AM
> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Big Bench
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I copy here too:
>
> Many people disagree about using or implying amenity=bench for such
> features. If we need a more wide spread tagging scheme I may adapt my
> proposal to:
>
> tourism=giant_furniture
>
> + giant_furniture=bench
>
> + brand=Big Bench
>
>
> In this way, most of the example made by Schoschi, are suitable to be
> adapted.
>
> May this be an acceptable compromise?
>
> Francesco
>
>
>
> Il lun 17 mag 2021, 19:53 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
>
> On 17 May 2021, at 18:54, Francesco Ansanelli <francians at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I may agree on brand=Big bench, it's a kind of brand in the end.
>
>
>
>
>
> if Big bench is a brand the tag is fine, but it is not sufficient. You’d
> still need a tag to describe it. amenity=bench is not suitable IMHO, you
> have to climb on these and to use them, a certain ability is required.
>
>
>
> Here’s an example for a big bench that is probably not from this company:
> https://moabitonline.de/738
>
>
>
> Cheers Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210519/b53bb59a/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list