[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Defensive works

[Volker Schmidt]

The main problem with this new (for me)  proposal is that it has the same
defect as bunker, only with more details.
The defect is that it is very specific to a  certain period and a certain
part of the world.
It is not applicable to Celtic Hill Fort, or a Roman fort, or the Great
Wall of China, or pre-Renaissance fortified castles, any other of a large
number of other fortifications in different places or time periods.
And many of the European Renaissance fortifications, for which this
proposal is applicable, are already on the map with all kinds of different
mapping approaches  Example: Palmanova
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/66503251>, Italy

On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 17:38, Casper Kersten <casperkersten1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear OSM friends,
>
> I have reworked my proposal for defensive works that I started in July
> this year. Your feedback on the previous version was very useful; I've done
> my best to reduce overlap and conflicts with existing tags. I'd appreciate
> feedback on the current version so I can refine the proposal for an
> eventual "final" version that can be brought to vote.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Defensive_structures
>
> Best regards
>
> Casper
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211110/28f75e72/attachment.htm>