[Tagging] 2 churches sharing one church?

Jmapb jmapb at gmx.com
Thu Nov 11 14:49:50 UTC 2021


On 11/9/2021 11:56 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> The easy approach is a building=church way, then put two
> amenity=place_of_workship nodes inside it.

Yeah, I've done this. I know a single building that houses Christian and
Jewish communities with distinct names and contact info, neither more
prominent than the other, so this seems like the correct solution.


>
> Is one more considered main, and the other just sharing their space?
> Could have the lesser one as a node only with the main one on a way.

I've done this too, when it appears that a smaller church has set up
shop inside a larger one. (And the sub-tenant doesn't have to be a
church either -- commonly I've seen schools, childcare, social
facilities, charity shops, etc. inside church buildings. There's even a
famous story of a destroyed:amenity=bureau_de_change.)


>
> Alternatively you could have a building=church way (way 1), then a
> amenity=place_of_workship way (way 2) outside covering the grounds,
> then another amenity=place_of_workship way (way 3) sharing the same
> nodes as way 2 so they are overlapping. This represents the fact that
> these two Churches share the same ground- but each have their own name

This is clever, but I don't think I'd recommend it.

  - It might be hard to verify that that no portion of the building or
grounds is used exclusively by one community or the other.
  - Not all churches have grounds. (Of course you could actually use the
building's nodes for all three ways, but I don't see this as an
improvement on the two-place-of-worship-nodes solution.)
  - I generally prefer to map grounds as landuse=religious and save the
place_of_worship tags for the location where the worship services happen.

J




More information about the Tagging mailing list