[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' for keys 'network:type', 'lcn' and 'lwn'

[Peter Elderson]

Sorry, I gave the wrong impression. A mega-cycleway-collection was their
first idea.
Now, I think, they want to create a large number of smaller route
relations. I do not yet fully understand what is to achieved by this. I
also do not quite see where such a route begins and ends, and how this
relates to the indications on the guideposts.

Vr gr Peter Elderson


Op ma 15 nov. 2021 om 18:48 schreef Brian M. Sperlongano <
zelonewolf at gmail.com>:

> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:34 AM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Apart from the practical problems of determining/verifying where the
>> proposed "basic network"-routes start, go and end, I am still trying to
>> understand what the use case/added value is of creating a network of all
>> cyclable ways of a certain quality.
>>
>
> Oh, I didn't realize that this was proposing to make some kind of
> mega-relation with every unnamed cycle route in it.  If that's the concept,
> I would definitely oppose that idea.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211115/a150e461/attachment.htm>