[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' for keys 'network:type', 'lcn' and 'lwn'

[Peter Elderson]

Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>:

> So why not just do this:
>
> type=network
> route=bicycle
> network=lcn
>
> Exactly the same as a point-to-point bike route, but with type=network
> rather than type=route. It does what it says on the tin ("type=network", of
> which there are 3.3k already), it's simple, and it accords with existing
> tagging.
>

What would be the members of this network relation? All the ways making up
the network, or a set of routes?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211116/3e2698a6/attachment.htm>