[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' for keys 'network:type', 'lcn' and 'lwn'

[Peter Elderson]

Sarah Hoffmann:

> We model the road network with ways with a highway=* tag. That is simple

and works extremely well. For the guideposts we have
> destination relations. I strongly recommend to do exactly the same for
> cycling/hiking. Invent a new tag bike_way=primary/secondary/whatever
> and pedestrian_way=primary/secondary/whatever and put that on the
> roads where the basic network goes over. Use the existing destination
> relations for the guideposts and you have everything in your infrastructure
> that you need.
>

I think something like this would serve the routing and rendering purposes
with less mapping effort and less (pre)processing.
But it would be sort of the same as the OP mentioned before: they tagged
lcn=yes on the ways, and moved from there to route relations containing all
the designated "bike_ways".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211117/8fc3825b/attachment.htm>