[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' - cycle_network?

[JochenB]

Am 24.11.2021 um 09:59 schrieb Yves via Tagging:
> Not to say relations are not needed, but trying too hard to make a new relation type for each and every model fitting the views of a particular set of users or coordinators seems useless.

The aim of the proposal is not to define new relation types. It is only
a matter of making existing relationships distinguishable by means of an
additional property.

This information cannot be derived from the properties of the ways. You
have to be mapped by us either to the ways themselves or to the relation.