[Tagging] cyclist profiles - was:Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' - cycle_network?

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:53 AM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:

> 5. icn, ncn, rcn and lcn are used for recreational routes.
>

Says who?  lcn is a "local cycling network", it says absolutely nothing
about the purpose for which people might use the cycleway.  There is
nothing in the English or German wiki pages that I can find that backs up
this assertion.  I maintain that lcn etc are perfectly fine tagging for
either recreational or commuter usage, and I find the distinction you're
making to be strange.

We don't tag roads this way, so I don't see why we'd tag cycleways this way.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211128/c7567571/attachment.htm>