[Tagging] cyclist profiles - was:Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' - cycle_network?

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, 10:42 AM s8evq <s8evqq at runbox.com> wrote:

>
> As I wrote above, in practice, this doesn't pose a problem for the routes
> here in Belgium. They are very easily to tell apart with some common sense.


It sounds like you're making completely subjective assessments, rather than
simply mapping what is on the ground. I don't see how this could possibly
meet any definition of verifiability.  If there isn't some kind of
designation that you're recording, you're just making stuff up.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211130/ffe219f4/attachment.htm>