[Tagging] cyclist profiles - was:Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' - cycle_network?

[Dave F]

On 30/11/2021 15:37, s8evq wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 05:58:39 -0500, "Brian M. Sperlongano" <zelonewolf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I find it difficult to make this distinction. How can you see whether a
>>> route “is” touristic or not?
> Local mappers in Belgium use common sense.
> - Almost all touristic cycle routes are loops (except node network).
> - The tourist cycle routes are advertised as such
> - You can easily tell by the name
> - You can easily tell by the operator (for example tourism office)


How are commuters prevented from using part of a "loop route" to get to 
the office?
How are "tourists" prevented from using linear, non looping routes?
Barcelona is advertised as a tourist destination. It doesn't prevent 
business commuters going there for meetings.

As stated by others, it's the decision of the rider that defines why 
they're using it..

Dave F.