[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Rejected - Multiple landuse

[Christoph Hormann]

> Vincent van Duijnhoven <vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com> hat am 12.10.2021 17:36 geschrieben:
> 
> Thanks for voting on the proposal. Unfortunately, it is rejected (23 oppose, 14 approve). 38% approved so there seems to be some interest in this double tagging, only not enough. The discussion also quickly turned to the subject of semicolon seperated values and the likes or dislikes about these values.
> 

My impression is that a lot of the discussion and the negative comments in the vote focused on the specific application examples in urban land use.  This is a field where there is traditionally already a strong lack of consensus on the status quo in tagging in the first place (i.e. there are strongly diverging views on how things are to be mapped and tagged at the moment).

In hindsight i think a better strategy would have been to bring up the proposal in a less contested domain (specifically the application on natural areas with mixed or multi-layered characteristics).  For cases like:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetraclinis_articulata_kz26_Morocco.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maquis_brul%C3%A9_Balagne.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Southeastern_Iberian_shrubs_and_woodlands#/media/File:Carretera_panorámica_-_Mirado
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mediterranean_dry_woodlands_and_steppe#/media/File:Alto_Tajo_1975_01.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2012-01-10_14-53-40_Spain_Canarias_Cofete.jpg


--
Christoph Hormann
https://www.imagico.de/