[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (artwork_type=maypole)

[Anne-Karoline Distel]

I agree that they're not artwork, apart from man_made, my first idea was
also amenity.

Anne

On 21/10/2021 19:30, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 21 Oct 2021, at 18:33, Michael Straßer <Strasser_Michael at gmx.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>> If you look at what is man_made then the maypole does not really fit.
>
>
> if we are discussing where they fit, then artwork is not a good
> classification IMHO. There may be some maypoles that are considered
> artwork, but generally these are much more about tradition and
> folklore than about art.
>
> We should rather stick with man_made than change to artwork. Amenity
> could be an option as well, but they do not really provide anything
> that’s why man_made was chosen (historic also has been discussed, but
> they aren’t necessarily historic).
>
> Changing a well established tag is very expensive, there must be
> really compelling reasons to make an attempt. There is nothing
> critical with maypoles being tagged with a man_made tag[1]
>
> Cheers Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] (to be honest, the name “man_made” has been contested as a whole
> for gender reasons, this view hasn’t found a majority so far, but
> there may be a general issue with the key).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211021/9fc23101/attachment-0001.htm>