[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (artwork_type=maypole)

Michael Straßer strasser_michael at gmx.de
Sun Oct 24 11:08:23 UTC 2021


We don't dance around the tree now. With us, the traditional costume
club dances next to it ;-).
Social meeting place, yes. Especially the preparation time is one big
party 8-).

Best regards
Miche101


Am 23.10.21 um 16:13 schrieb Anne- Karoline Distel:
> I was under the impression that people danced around them. A social
> gathering point.
>
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE <http://WEB.DE> Mail. Please
> excuse my brevity.
> On 23/10/2021, 09:31 "Michael Straßer" <strasser_michael at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     amenity is not so because a Maypole has no use. You can only look
>     at it, photograph it, touch it ;-)
>
>     -
>     useful and important facilities for visitors and residents
>     -
>     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
>
>     Best regards
>     Miche101
>
>
>
>     Am 21.10.21 um 21:51 schrieb Anne-Karoline Distel:
>
>         I agree that they're not artwork, apart from man_made, my
>         first idea was also amenity.
>
>         Anne
>
>         On 21/10/2021 19:30, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
>
>             sent from a phone
>
>                 On 21 Oct 2021, at 18:33, Michael Straßer
>                 <Strasser_Michael at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>                 If you look at what is man_made then the maypole does
>                 not really fit.
>
>
>
>             if we are discussing where they fit, then artwork is not a
>             good classification IMHO. There may be some maypoles that
>             are considered artwork, but generally these are much more
>             about tradition and folklore than about art.
>
>             We should rather stick with man_made than change to
>             artwork. Amenity could be an option as well, but they do
>             not really provide anything that’s why man_made was chosen
>             (historic also has been discussed, but they aren’t
>             necessarily historic).
>
>             Changing a well established tag is very expensive, there
>             must be really compelling reasons to make an attempt.
>             There is nothing critical with maypoles being tagged with
>             a man_made tag[1]
>
>             Cheers Martin
>
>
>
>
>
>             [1] (to be honest, the name “man_made” has been contested
>             as a whole for gender reasons, this view hasn’t found a
>             majority so far, but there may be a general issue with the
>             key).
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             Tagging mailing list
>             Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>             https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>     _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing
>     list Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211024/5d3f01df/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list