[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (artwork_type=maypole)
Michael Straßer
strasser_michael at gmx.de
Sun Oct 24 11:08:23 UTC 2021
We don't dance around the tree now. With us, the traditional costume
club dances next to it ;-).
Social meeting place, yes. Especially the preparation time is one big
party 8-).
Best regards
Miche101
Am 23.10.21 um 16:13 schrieb Anne- Karoline Distel:
> I was under the impression that people danced around them. A social
> gathering point.
>
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE <http://WEB.DE> Mail. Please
> excuse my brevity.
> On 23/10/2021, 09:31 "Michael Straßer" <strasser_michael at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> amenity is not so because a Maypole has no use. You can only look
> at it, photograph it, touch it ;-)
>
> -
> useful and important facilities for visitors and residents
> -
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
>
> Best regards
> Miche101
>
>
>
> Am 21.10.21 um 21:51 schrieb Anne-Karoline Distel:
>
> I agree that they're not artwork, apart from man_made, my
> first idea was also amenity.
>
> Anne
>
> On 21/10/2021 19:30, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 21 Oct 2021, at 18:33, Michael Straßer
> <Strasser_Michael at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> If you look at what is man_made then the maypole does
> not really fit.
>
>
>
> if we are discussing where they fit, then artwork is not a
> good classification IMHO. There may be some maypoles that
> are considered artwork, but generally these are much more
> about tradition and folklore than about art.
>
> We should rather stick with man_made than change to
> artwork. Amenity could be an option as well, but they do
> not really provide anything that’s why man_made was chosen
> (historic also has been discussed, but they aren’t
> necessarily historic).
>
> Changing a well established tag is very expensive, there
> must be really compelling reasons to make an attempt.
> There is nothing critical with maypoles being tagged with
> a man_made tag[1]
>
> Cheers Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] (to be honest, the name “man_made” has been contested
> as a whole for gender reasons, this view hasn’t found a
> majority so far, but there may be a general issue with the
> key).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing
> list Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211024/5d3f01df/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list