[Tagging] V3 to V4 Mapillary image id migration

[Volker Schmidt]

I have just corrected three of my making. New Mapillary image codes, but
two of them semicolon-separated.  Arbitrarily removed  one of them.

On Sun, 31 Oct 2021, 14:40 Kai Michael Poppe, <osm at poppe.dev> wrote:

> Hi Mateusz,
>
> Nope, those old values are gone. People have either deleted them or
> deleted their accounts all together with the option to remove their photos
> along with it. They are gone and can not be recovered by Mapillary.
>
> The manual MapRoulette fix is hoping that another person has a photo of
> the same object.
>
> Kai
>
> 31.10.2021 14:30:49 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
>
>
>
>
> Oct 30, 2021, 15:51 by me-osm-tagging at keepawayfromfire.co.uk:
>
> On Sat, 2021-10-30 at 11:52 +0200, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
>
> 2 - There are ~2.6k "old" values in the key, that match the correct
> pattern but that have since been deleted from Mapillary. Please give me
> your opinion on how the automated edit shall handle them: a) remove
> completely and don't care anymore b) remove the key and put more info
> in the changeset comment c) leave the old key even though it has no use
> anymore d) move to old:mapillary=* (or something like that)
>
>
> Possibly an option E. That would be to do option C, and set up a
> MapRoulette for people to manually go through and clean up those
> objects. There may other images already in Mapillary that correspond to
> the object, remove the mapillary=* if there isn't, or remove the whole
> OSM object if it is no longer relevant.
>
> It only really works if there are people motivated to do the
> MapRoulette. I'll try to find some time to help out on the current one
> [1], but the one I describe as option E would be significantly bigger.
>
>
> I would try MapRouelette, just in case someone would be interested.
>
> After some time remove them, but with clear description in edit
> (and also in an approved bot edit).
>
> old:mapillary=* is definitely bad idea, what is the point of linking
> something
> that will never be available again?
>
> PS Just to check: is it maybe caused by extra space or some other
> whitespace
> or other easily fixable issue?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211031/d1ee8bab/attachment.htm>