[Tagging] pressurized=* on pipelines

Kyle Hensel K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz
Thu Sep 16 20:33:33 UTC 2021


>> Additionally, is pressure=no acceptable?
> isn’t there always some pressure, also in open rivers, streams etc.?

Indeed, that's why I thought pressurized=yes/no is better than pressure=yes/no because the latter is semantically confusing.

'pressurized' means there is a deliberate effort to maintain a pressure level that is different to the surrounding area.
So pressurized=no is a logical tag, but pressure=no makes no sense.


Kyle
________________________________
From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2021, 20:02
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] pressurized=* on pipelines


sent from a phone

> On 15 Sep 2021, at 09:25, Kyle Hensel <K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz> wrote:
>
> Additionally, is pressure=no acceptable?


isn’t there always some pressure, also in open rivers, streams etc.?

Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210916/b94f2ead/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list