[Tagging] creameries

Anne-Karoline Distel annekadistel at web.de
Sat Sep 18 11:07:56 UTC 2021


I linked three in a previous email which have several photos. I have
come across some which have a commemorative plaque outside, so it's not
just memory; it is recorded.

Anne

On 18/09/2021 07:46, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> Can you link photo of such place?
>
> Is there some building style/infrastructure there?
>
> Or is it case of people just remembering that some
> enterprise existed there?
>
>
> Sep 18, 2021, 01:22 by annekadistel at web.de:
>
>     "we map what's present" - is that current use? What if it's
>     vacant? Do we map what we see or what the locals see, i.e. "That
>     looks like an interesting building, what is it?" - "Oh, that's the
>     old creamery, but it closed in 1975." Do you tag that as
>     building=yes or building=industrial or whatever the outcome of
>     this discussion will be?
>
>     Anne
>
>     On 17/09/2021 23:53, Dave F via Tagging wrote:
>>     On 17/09/2021 20:44, Yves via Tagging wrote:
>>
>>>     Building=church is not used because it's a place of worship, but
>>>     because the building have a church architecture.
>>
>>     If I was to build a residential property in a style that I, or
>>     more importantly, you perceive as a church; & to then say it
>>     should be tagged as a church, even though it's *never* been one,
>>     is ridiculous.
>>
>>     The building:use tag inappropriately expects contributors to make
>>     guesses bases purely on a building's visual appearance.
>>
>>     What does a 'architecturally like a church' church look like?
>>     it's so varied.
>>
>>     This is a church:
>>     https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/mud-hut-used-as-church-zambian-bush-170127141.jpg
>>     <https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/mud-hut-used-as-church-zambian-bush-170127141.jpg>
>>
>>
>>     In OSM we map what's current. When a building stops being used as
>>     a church/school/whatever, the building tag get s amended
>>     appropriated;. If someone wishes to record what it was, the
>>     historic tag, or similar can be used.
>>
>>     DaveF
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Tagging mailing list
>>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210918/ba250687/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list