[Tagging] tagging for red-turn signage for cyclists

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Apr 9, 2022, 11:48 by info at mcliquid.de:

> Hello,
>
> How would you map the interpretation of the small black traffic sign?
> https://img.chmedia.ch/2021/1/6/507a62ed-ecf9-4dca-91d8-7ccea2b42bcb.jpeg
> Sign location: Switzerland
>
> The expression is a right-hand drive permission at red lights for cyclists.
>
> The English wiki suggests red_turn:right:bicycle=yes
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Red_turn#Examples
>
seems fitting

But is it something present on all traffic lights? Or only some?
If it is a rule applying in general it may be dubious whether it should be mapped

Main problem here, is that while I dislike relations it may be tricky to guess
to which road this red turn right applies, maybe relation may  be needed
for a full clarity.

> In France, a relation is suggested with restriction:bicycle=give_way
> But it's a totally different sign.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Signalisation_routi%C3%A8re_en_France#Panonceaux_de_type_M
>
> I came across the second one in Switzerland due to a "wrong turn-restriction" error and wanted to ask if there is a consensus on this? Would it be correct to tag the sign as a relation like this?
>
"restriction:bicycle=give_way" should not be interpreted/defined as
"red light do not apply to cyclist".

That is highly confusing and a bad idea.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220410/ed27500e/attachment.htm>