[Tagging] How to tag sub-areas?

[Steve Lee]

The whole of the farm, campus, and park I'm talking about is one unit, but
their parts are relatively closed physically, so they have a name. In fact,
the overall name is mainly used. It's a bit like an administrative
hierarchy, but doesn't seem to have usage outside of administrative
boundaries.
Some lakes may be suitable for natural=bay, but other lakes are divided
into separate waters by dikes, and some mappers write the name of each
water area in the format "<overall name> <part name>", which I think is not
acceptable.

Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> 於 2022年4月11日週一 上午6:08寫道：

> The split farm, campus & park, i'd draw as multiples eg 2 parks named A &
> B, or even just "Park North" & "Park South".
>
> The lake is a bit trickier though?
>
> natural=bay perhaps, if that's appropriate?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 00:38, Steve Lee <stevel2520 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   Many features and their parts have names, but labeling them with the
>> same tag would be considered an error. For example, each part of a lake has
>> a name, and the lake as a whole also has the same name as one of its parts
>> or a different name; each part of a farm divided by a river has a name;
>> each part of a campus divided by roads has a name; the parts of a park
>> divided by roads are also named. How should they be tagged?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220411/1e0f6e6c/attachment.htm>