[Tagging] Delete vs Removed LSP?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Apr 27, 2022, 00:39 by graemefitz1 at gmail.com:

>
>
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 at 23:22, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Because it is
>> - unverifiable for mappers
>> - often tricky: one historian will claim "it is certainly remain of old chapel of following
>> shape", other will dispute is it certain, another will claim that it was a palace,
>> another will describe it as a city wall, another will...
>>
>
> But wouldn't all of that simply be tagged as an archeological site?
>
yes, such tagging is fine but
destroyed:building=chapel 
in shape reconstructed by one of archeologists is not
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220427/990e153a/attachment.htm>