[Tagging] Delete vs Removed LSP?

[Dave F]

On 28/04/2022 14:15, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>
>
> Apr 28, 2022, 14:26 by davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com:
>
>     On 28/04/2022 12:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>>     Note that you never can be 100% sure unless you map with Vespucci
>>     or Go Map!! on site.
>
>     Eyes/Camera/Notebook
>
> Building can become demolished between visit on site and mapping.

Sorry, but that's just barrel scraping.

>
>>
>>     Even mapping just next to place where I live I sometimes would
>>     map no longer
>>     existing building if demolished:building=yes area would be not
>>     present.
>
>     Unsure why you think that validates the problem.
>
> There are two solutions
> (1) ban mapping from aerial imagery without local survey (even in area
> recently visited)
> (2) have solution to temporarily mark no longer existing objects

You appear to be saying mapping everything is compulsory.
It's strange how a few feel 'not mapping something they don't 
understand' isn't an option.

DaveF


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220429/e9eb6804/attachment.htm>