[Tagging] Tagging cycleways to distinguish them from combined cycle and footways

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Aug 3, 2022, 09:23 by marc_marc at mailo.com:

> Le 03.08.22 à 00:52, Niels Elgaard Larsen a écrit :
>
>> Jens Glad Balchen:
>>
>>> any highway=cycleway should be regarded as a combined cycle and footway.
>>>
>>
>> I disagree with that.
>>
>
> me too
>
>> If it is a real cycleway, tag it as highway=cycleway.
>>
>
> +1
>
>> If it signed for both cycling and walking tag it as highway=path,foot=designated,bicycle=designated,segregated={yes,no}
>>
>
> +1
>
+1 in general (but I ma be missing something Norway-specific,
I know nothing about Norway!

>> If it just a path that can be used by pedestrians and cyclists, tag it as highway=footway,bicycle=yes
>>
> if it just a path, tag it as a path : highway=path
> acces restriction by country sould be enought, don't tag the legislation
>
I am not so sure here. Especially of area has many paths where cycling
is forbidden then bicycle=yes makes sense.

If it is footway where cycling is legal and on most/many footway it is 
illegal then bicycle=yes is valuable.

> add surface/smothness
>
+1

PS Sorry, for "not eligible" in my previous email. It should be obviously just "eligible"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220803/5403b287/attachment.htm>