[Tagging] Tagging cycleways to distinguish them from combined cycle and footways

[Peter Elderson]

There's not much of a shoulder in that picture.

Mvg Peter Elderson

> Op 3 aug. 2022 om 11:04 heeft Jeroen Hoek <mail at jeroenhoek.nl> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
>> 
>> They must use either road's shoulder when they can instead of using
>> either road's "way" (carriageway or cycleway), so if the choice
>> hypothecially was only between the carriageway's shoulder and the
>> cycleway, and the cycleway's shoulder for some reason was not a
>> choice, the carriageway's shoulder is what the law says they must
>> choose.
> 
> Have a look at this typical Dutch situation:
> 
> https://www.google.com/maps/@53.1426041,5.7397237,3a,75y,228.33h,88.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAhezo74J5tsgo0u0mM-oNQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
> 
> On the right, a road, on the left, a compulsory cycleway. Dutch law says that pedestrians must use the cycleway here (and they may walk on its hard surface), and may not use the shoulder of the road because the (much safer) cycleway is there. So the road gets foot=use_sidepath, and the cycleway has no foot value (because the Dutch default access tags have foot=yes for highway=cycleway), or foot=yes.
> 
> So you are saying that in Norway, in a case like this, pedestrians can choose to use the shoulder of both the road and the cycleway?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging