[Tagging] building=entrance
Andrew Hain
andrewhainosm at hotmail.co.uk
Tue Dec 13 07:29:13 UTC 2022
I also support that mass retagging of building=entrance nodes attached to buildings.
--
Andrew
________________________________
From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
Sent: 13 December 2022 00:26
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] building=entrance
sent from a phone
> On 12 Dec 2022, at 22:13, Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com> wrote:
>
> i dislike the idea to have tag with several meaning depending
> if it's on a node or a closed way
One could say the distinction is in the meaning, not in the object type,
there is a tag that was used in the past on nodes of building outlines, building=entrance, it is deprecated for ages, since then tagged as entrance=*
and it is should be hardly confused with building=entrance, which is a regular use of the building tag to specify an entrance building.
I think the case is so well defined it would be possible to automatically retag those remaining 2400 building=entrance on nodes that are part of a building area outline to entrance=yes .
Or maybe a call to action and manually distinguish between main and yes values?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221213/88c5e1e7/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list