[Tagging] RFC - Proposed features/emergency=lifeboat station
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Dec 17 08:41:59 UTC 2022
17 gru 2022, 01:19 od graemefitz1 at gmail.com:
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Marc_marc <> marc_marc at mailo.com> > wrote:
>
>> Le 16.12.22 à 08:30, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
>>
>> > In this case amenity=lifeboat is - I expect - used to map lifeboat
>> > stationing place, not lifeboat itself
>>
>> of course, like marina doesn't map boats but the mooring area
>>
>
> Yes, that is how they are being used, but the tag is being completed with the name & details of the lifeboat itself, which, to me at least, infers that this boat is always at this spot, & it isn't.
>
> The other issue with the currently mapped info is that most of it appears to have come from an unauthorised source.
>
Can you link problematic changeset? (if there is import from invalid source then
contacting DWG is a good idea. Also, I hope that I am not writing this
to DWG member again)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221217/b9462c29/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list