[Tagging] Foot / sidewalk access tagging
Graeme Fitzpatrick
graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 18 22:27:53 UTC 2022
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 06:32, Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> I recently came across an unexpected tagging combination and I would like
> to understand how folks in various places would interpret this:
>
> highway=<whatever>
> foot=no
> sidewalk=separate
>
> Would folks regard that as accurate data modeling?
>
Hmmm?
Possibly accurate but definitely confusing!
To me it says that there's a road here, which you can't walk on, but
there's also a separate sidewalk (is that even a thing? I thought
sidewalks, by definition, are hard up against the road?), but it doesn't
say whether or not you can walk on that? I guess I'd call it an error?
It would be much nicer to drop the sidewalk=separate from the road, & draw
a separate footway, which would fix everything!
Currently taking bets on how long it will take before someone actually
> answers the question I posed 😂
>
Are you happy now? :-)
What do I win? :-)
Thanks
Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221219/58341e32/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list