[Tagging] Feature proposal - Approved - deprecate embassy=embassy

[Simon Poole]

Am 04.02.2022 um 01:05 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick:
> ...
> So, it doesn't appear to have ever been discussed on here, or voted 
> on, & from the comments on that page, should never have been an 
> amenity= in the first place, but what do we now do to "fix" it?
> ...

Why would it need to be fixed?

The overwhelming majority of users never see anything else than a "Dojo" 
label when adding/editing/whatever such facilities with the current 
tagging, and with a different tagging, they would just continue to see 
"Dojo". As long as the tagging is conflict free (in a technical sense) a 
change just doesn't provide any added value, only downsides. I could see 
an angle pro change if there were specific semantics associated with the 
tagging, so say water=dojo would probably not be a good idea, but moving 
things around in facility tags just doesn't do anything.

BTW it is no different with parcel lockers, the large majority of  users 
had previously added and manipulated these as "Parcel lockers", and 
guess what, they continue to remain "Parcel lockers".

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220204/98912c05/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220204/98912c05/attachment.sig>