[Tagging] Feature proposal - Approved - deprecate embassy=embassy

[Simon Poole]

Am 04.02.2022 um 09:52 schrieb Florian LAINEZ:
> Hi,
> Thanks for all your replies.
>
> I tried to discuss privately with Simon in order to find a common 
> ground. Nevertheless I had no reply at all and at the same time I see 
> that Simon changed the definition of deprecation to fit his view 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposal_process&diff=next&oldid=2256141 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposal_process&diff=next&oldid=2256141>
I removed the sole reference to deprecation on the page that was added 
in 2016 as it was being jumped on as proof that the process concerned 
itself with deprecation, which lets say is a long shot giving what that 
sentence said, and definitely in no imaginable way was it a definition 
of deprecation.
>
> Now I feel really sorry about how this public discussion is evolving 
> and as I don't see any good coming from it soon, I think it's time for 
> me to step back for a while.
>
You just fail to mention that despite having the private conversation 
you didn't hold still, so I came to the conclusion that there is no 
further value in the discussion and you were just stringing me along.

> I will think of a proposal that could fit our different point of views 
> with the help of the french community.
> I am sure that we will all succeed to change the project in the right 
> direction as long as we remain constructive.
> Regards
>
>
> Le ven. 4 févr. 2022 à 02:38, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> a écrit :
>
>
>     Am 04.02.2022 um 01:05 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick:
>>     ...
>>     So, it doesn't appear to have ever been discussed on here, or
>>     voted on, & from the comments on that page, should never have
>>     been an amenity= in the first place, but what do we now do to
>>     "fix" it?
>>     ...
>
>     Why would it need to be fixed?
>
>     The overwhelming majority of users never see anything else than a
>     "Dojo" label when adding/editing/whatever such facilities with the
>     current tagging, and with a different tagging, they would just
>     continue to see "Dojo". As long as the tagging is conflict free
>     (in a technical sense) a change just doesn't provide any added
>     value, only downsides. I could see an angle pro change if there
>     were specific semantics associated with the tagging, so say
>     water=dojo would probably not be a good idea, but moving things
>     around in facility tags just doesn't do anything.
>
>     BTW it is no different with parcel lockers, the large majority of 
>     users had previously added and manipulated these as "Parcel
>     lockers", and guess what, they continue to remain "Parcel lockers".
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> *Florian Lainez*
>
> @overflorian <http://twitter.com/overflorian>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220204/96ecb213/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220204/96ecb213/attachment-0001.sig>