[Tagging] Fwd: Lifecycle of rail
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Feb 10 08:27:08 UTC 2022
Feb 10, 2022, 00:49 by steveaOSM at softworkers.com:
> This IS somewhat confusing. To further the tenet we have that "definitive 'how-to-tag' guidelines be located at ONE sensible place in our wiki,"
>
That is quite poor tenet and if executed we would end with massive super-large articles
like "Roads" which has several megabytes text about roads, requires months to read
and lags on any browser and images fail to load.
>
> what I suggest we consider is that the entire section of
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction#Railways
> (with its pretty table and all)
>
> be moved (with a notation there to "See..." or "Main article..." with a link to below) to
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways
>
> as a newly titled section called "Construction" (between "Stations and stops" and "Life-cycle").
>
having unmanageable large articles is not helpful for people trying to learn about tagging
>
> Additionally, there is the issue of whether we need to or might also explicitly tag access=no on rail (we don't seem to need to do this for highways, and it is widely understood that railway right-of-way is closed to public access). That can be addressed in the new (-ly moved) wiki section, if it needs to be.
>
railways are access controlled by default, tagging access on them seems dubious
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220210/ee3197a7/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list