[Tagging] An after-burner meta-discussion
bkil
bkil.hu+Aq at gmail.com
Mon Feb 14 10:00:58 UTC 2022
I joined the list last year because others invited me, suggesting that
they would value my ideas for improvement. If you think everything is
good as is, just disregard my suggestion.
By the way, I've read through and replied to thousands of OSM comments
in the past, but that didn't turn up to be useful to anybody.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:48 AM stevea <steveaOSM at softworkers.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2022, at 1:00 AM, bkil <bkil.hu+Aq at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry I didn't read through this wall of text. Similarly I mute almost
> > all conversations on this list nowadays due to its low entropy and
> > hostile nature.
> >
> > It would be great if somebody could run a kind of weekly digest or
> > magazine where they read through all threads and shared a very short
> > TL;DR about opinions and reasoning pro & con. Something like ToS;DR,
> > but for forums/mailing lists:
> > https://tosdr.org/
>
> bkil, if you are so [pressed for time, lazy, can’t-be-bothered…] to respond to what is not a “wall of text” (it’s less than one screen full at 421 words, maybe “an average composition for a primary-school student"), with "TL;DR," why do you subscribe to this list?
>
> Plus, I’ve already placed you into the category of “should tune elsewhere” even before you wrote your (rude) response. So, go be mute.
>
> These are serious topics I bring up. If you can’t engage in constructive criticism or better, be gone with you from here.
>
> Concision, in the sense that it is an attempt to censor (as in, "shut up, you’re blabbering too much"), has no place in this discussion.
>
> Those who would give up thoughtful exchange of ideas for an "easy pill to swallow” of “opinions and reasoning pro & con” deserve neither.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list